Meaning of 1 Samuel 20:27
But the next day, the second day of the month, David`s place was empty again. Then Saul said to his son Jonathan, “Why hasn`t the son of Jesse come to the meal, either yesterday or today?”
1 Samuel 20:27
This verse marks a critical turning point in the escalating animosity between Saul and David, revealing Saul's growing suspicion and David's precarious position. The "meal" refers to the New Moon festival, a significant religious observance in ancient Israel, making David's absence conspicuous and immediately raising Saul's ire. Saul's question to Jonathan is not one of genuine concern but rather a pointed accusation, fueled by his paranoia and resentment towards David, whom he perceives as a threat to his throne. Jonathan, caught between his loyalty to his father and his deep love and covenant with David, finds himself in an agonizing dilemma, foreshadowing the difficult choices he will later make.
Context and Background
The narrative unfolds during a period when Saul's reign is increasingly unstable. David has gained immense popularity and military success, particularly after defeating Goliath, which has stirred deep insecurity in Saul. Saul's initial affection for David has curdled into bitter jealousy and a murderous obsession. The New Moon festival was a communal gathering, a time of supposed peace and fellowship, but for David, it has become a dangerous trap. His absence is a deliberate strategy, orchestrated with Jonathan, to test Saul's disposition and confirm the extent of his animosity. Jonathan's role as mediator is central here; he is privy to both Saul's dangerous intentions and David's need for safety.
Key Themes and Messages
- Suspicion and Paranoia: Saul's reaction exemplifies the destructive nature of unchecked suspicion, which blinds him to reason and leads him to seek the destruction of a loyal servant.
- Loyalty and Betrayal: The verse highlights the complex dynamics of loyalty. Saul expects absolute loyalty from his son, while Jonathan grapples with conflicting loyalties to his father and his covenant friend, David.
- Divine Providence and Protection: Despite the immediate danger, David is operating under a plan with Jonathan, suggesting a reliance on wisdom and perhaps even divine guidance to navigate this perilous situation.
- The Consequences of Jealousy: Saul's jealousy is a driving force that propels the narrative towards further conflict and ultimately his own downfall.
Spiritual Significance and Application
This passage serves as a stark reminder of how negative emotions like jealousy, suspicion, and fear can corrupt even those in positions of leadership. For believers, it underscores the importance of discerning true intentions and recognizing when situations become unsafe due to the malice of others. It also points to the necessity of wise counsel and strategic planning when facing adversity, as David and Jonathan demonstrate. The spiritual application lies in cultivating a heart free from jealousy and suspicion, and in understanding the importance of genuine covenant relationships built on trust and love, even when external pressures threaten to divide.
Relation to the Broader Biblical Narrative
This event is a crucial step in the unfolding saga of David's persecution by Saul, setting the stage for David's flight and subsequent years as a fugitive. It directly precedes David's famous lament in Psalm 59, composed when he hid from Saul. This period of intense pressure and divine deliverance is foundational to David's development as a leader and his anointing as the future king of Israel. It illustrates the biblical theme of the righteous suffering persecution at the hands of the wicked, a pattern seen throughout Scripture, culminating in the ultimate suffering of Christ.
Analogies
One analogy for Saul's suspicion could be that of a homeowner who, consumed by unfounded fears, begins to see every shadow as an intruder and every rustle of leaves as a threat, leading them to lash out at innocent passersby. Another might be a king who, instead of relying on his wise advisors, listens to whispers of dissent and imagines conspiracies, ultimately alienating his most loyal subjects and weakening his kingdom. For Jonathan, the situation is akin to being a bridge between two warring factions, desperately trying to maintain peace while knowing that the chasm between them is widening.
Relation to Other Verses
This verse is intrinsically linked to the preceding and succeeding chapters, particularly 1 Samuel 19, where Saul first attempts to kill David, and 1 Samuel 20, which details the covenant between David and Jonathan and their plan involving the arrow signals. It also echoes themes found in the Psalms, where David frequently writes about being pursued by enemies and seeking refuge in God (e.g., Psalm 59, "To the choirmaster. To destroy not. A miktam of David, when Saul sent and they watched the house to kill him."). Furthermore, Saul's irrational jealousy and persecution of David can be seen as a foreshadowing of the rejection and persecution of Jesus by the religious and political authorities of his day, as described in the Gospels.
Related topics
Similar verses
When Saul saw how successful he was, he was afraid of him.
1 Samuel 18:15
Saul became still more afraid of him, and he remained his enemy the rest of his days.
1 Samuel 18:29
Then David fled from Naioth at Ramah and went to Jonathan and asked, “What have I done? What is my crime? How have I wronged your father, that he is trying to kill me?”
1 Samuel 20:1
But David took an oath and said, “Your father knows very well that I have found favor in your eyes, and he has said to himself, ‘Jonathan must not know this or he will be grieved.` Yet as surely as the Lord lives and as you live, there is only a step between me and death.”

